刘高军,郭玥,姜龙,杜磊,李庆
LIU Gaojun,GUO Yue,JIANG Long,DU Lei,LI Qing

• 1:华北电力科学研究院有限责任公司

摘要(Abstract)：

按照国家环保要求(燃煤发电机组脱硝装置出口NO_x质量浓度≤50 mg/m~3),对某350 MW燃煤机组手动调节阀门开度进行喷氨优化调整。优化调整后,A侧和B侧出口折算NO_x质量浓度均值分别为23.3 mg/m~3(标准状态、干基、6%O_2)和35.1 mg/m~3(标准状态、干基、6%O_2),满足排放标准,喷氨量分别降低13.1 m~3/h和17.1 m~3/h,氨逃逸分别降低0.78×10~(-6)和1.09×10~(-6);但调整前后同一测点平面不均匀度未有明显改善,相对高值和相对低值的位置不变。经分析,出现这种情况与脱硝装置的系统缺陷有关,建议电厂停机期间更换喷氨管道调节阀,检查喷氨分配管腐蚀情况及催化剂组块间密封情况,定期进行催化剂活性测试,发现问题及时消除。建立物理模型试验或者数值模型模拟,确定科学的导流板安装位置,优化烟气测量装置和控制逻辑,整体提升脱硝装置性能。
Ammonia injection is optimized and adjusted for a 350 MW coal-fired generating unit in accordance with the national environmental protection requirements(NO_xmass concentration of denitration export of coal-fired generating unit ≤50 mg/m~3). After the optimization and adjustment of ammonia injection of denitrification unit, the average mass concentration of converted NO_xat the exit of side A and side B is 23.3 mg/m~3(standard state, dry base, 6%O_2) and 35.1 mg/m~3(standard state, dry base, 6%O_2) respectively, which meet the emission standards, and the ammonia injection volume is reduced by 13.1 m~3/h and 17.1 m~3/h, respectively. Ammonia escape decreased by 0.78×10~(-6) and 1.09×10~(-6), respectively. However, the unevenness of the same measuring point plane has been not improved significantly before and after adjustment, and the positions of relatively high and relatively low values remained unchanged. It is suggested that during the shutdown period of the power plant, the regulator of ammonia injection pipeline should be replaced, the corrosion of ammonia injection distribution pipe should be checked, the sealing situation between catalyst blocks should be checked, and the catalyst activity test should be conducted regularly. If problems are found, the deficiency should be eliminated in time. Establish physical model test or numerical model simulation, optimize and determine the scientific installation position of the guide plate, optimize the smoke measuring device and control logic, and improve the denitration device performance as a whole.

关键词(KeyWords)： 燃煤机组;脱硝装置;喷氨优化;喷氨量;氨逃逸
coal-fired unit;denitrification device;ammonia injection optimization;ammonia injection amount;ammonia escape

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 刘高军,郭玥,姜龙,杜磊,李庆
LIU Gaojun,GUO Yue,JIANG Long,DU Lei,LI Qing

参考文献(References)：

• [1]张永民，邱爱慈，周海滨，等.面向化石能源开发的电爆炸冲击波技术研究进展[J].高电压技术，2016,42(4):1009-1017.
• [2]Ke Wang,Yi-Ming Wei.Sources of energy productivity change in China during 1997-2012:A decomposition analysis based on the Luenberger productivity indicator[J].Energy Economics,2016,54:50-59.
• [3]Qunwei Wang,Ye Hang,Licheng Sun,et al.Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China:A non-radial DEA approach[J].Technological Forecasting&Social Change,2016,112:254-261.
• [4]李际，康晓文，高虎.2016年我国电力发展形势回顾及2017年展望[J].中国能源，2017,39(3):27-32.
• [5]Yujiong Gu,Jing Xu,Dongchao Chen,et al.Overall review of peak shaving for coal-fired power units in China[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2016,54:723-731.
• [6]黄智，王东旭，陈晓利，等.SCR系统多维度精确喷氨策略脱硝特性研究[J].东北电力技术，2019,40(12):11-15,28.
• [7]徐平.燃煤火电机组超低排放技术路线分析与选择[J].华电技术，2015,37(9):55-58.
• [8]王荣，王晓风，王耀.2×600 MW机组锅炉宽负荷脱硝改造分析[J].东北电力技术，2020,41(9):19-21.
• [9]赵永椿，马斯鸣，杨建平，等.燃煤电厂污染物超低排放的发展与现状[J].煤炭学报，2015,40(11):2629-2640.